- From: Nils Dagsson Moskopp <nils-dagsson-moskopp@dieweltistgarnichtso.net>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 04:07:08 +0200
Sorry. forgot to use the correct mail address for the list. Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell at gmail.com> schrieb am Sun, 20 Jun 2010 21:06:57 -0400: > On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Nils Dagsson Moskopp > <nils-dagsson-moskopp at dieweltistgarnichtso.net> wrote: > > AFAIK, at least Firefox shows a fullscreen option already in the > > context menu. What makes you think there is another attribute > > needed (besides @controls) ? > > So... an interesting bit of fun comes up when you use layout tricks to > prevent the context menu in order to make save as impossible, and you > eliminate the full screen option as an unwanted side effect. History has shown repeatedly that people will go to great lengths to do unbelievable stupid things. However, I do not believe that we should condone this ? such a bozo "copy protection" scheme should never be a reason to make life anymore complex for users and implementors. Also, from a strategic point of view, if there is no possibility to disable certain useful functionality with the needed granularity (so that collateral damage is inevitable), malicious authors may get a clue and stop doing such things. > There is also the issue of the context menu not being an especially > intuitive or discoverable way of activating it, especially if all the > rest of the controls are buttons below the video. If this is the only problem, it clearly is an an implementor issue. UAs could show a little fullscreen button besides the volume / mute controls, no extra markup attribute needed. -- Nils Dagsson Moskopp // erlehmann <http://dieweltistgarnichtso.net> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 230 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20100621/26b39db6/attachment.pgp>
Received on Sunday, 20 June 2010 19:07:08 UTC