- From: Ashley Sheridan <ash@ashleysheridan.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 18:19:12 +0100
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 13:03 -0400, Eitan Adler wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Gordon P. Hemsley > <gphemsley at gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm not sure how you interpreted, but I wanted to clarify, in > case it wasn't clear. > > I'm pretty sure this person is asking why @required isn't > allowed on <select> elements. > > As in: > http://dev.w3.org/html5/markup/forms-attributes.html#shared-form.attrs.required > > > > > I don't know what the exact reasoning is for it not being on > there, nor do I know exactly how @required is supposed to be > enforced, but I do think that the method suggested in the bug > is a bad one. Sometimes, authors will include an empty > <option> on purpose in order to allow for an empty option to > be selected. > > > Perhaps the @requires attribute could be handled somewhat differently. > If present the "default" value becomes the "not allowed" value and the > browser would require you to change the value before submitting the > form. > > > > -- > Eitan Adler I would think it makes more sense for the app/site to choose a sensible default value. For instance, instead of the daft "-- please select a month--" type of options, how about just picking January by default and then letting the user override it? It's what I do on all my apps, and makes sense to me that if the user isn't bothered about changing the value, I only need care about whether it's a sensible value, and not whether it was actually a conscious choice. Thanks, Ash http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20100618/e2855e07/attachment-0001.htm>
Received on Friday, 18 June 2010 10:19:12 UTC