- From: Jeremy Orlow <jorlow@chromium.org>
- Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 16:17:44 +0100
In that case, I think your original email could have been much more clear and direct. On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Nikita Eelen <neelen at amvonet.com> wrote: > The point is will the device spec be implemented ever or even seriously > discussed, and if not why is it listed in the spec? > > > On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Jeremy Orlow <jorlow at chromium.org> wrote: > >> What is the point of this thread? I ask because I'm concerned this >> mailing list is not the right place for such a discussion and/or such a >> discussion isn't a fruitful use of time. (We know there are many gaps >> between what you can do on the web and what you can do on the desktop. The >> problem is one of resources to implement solutions.) >> >> J >> >> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 10:34 AM, narendra sisodiya < >> narendra at narendrasisodiya.com> wrote: >> >>> May someone explore what is not possible with HTML5 in spec and in >>> Implementations >>> >>> For example video telephony in browser is possible ? we draft DAP spec >>> but no implementations. So not possible at this moment. >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> ??????????????????????????? >>> ? Narendra Sisodiya >>> ? http://narendrasisodiya.com >>> ??????????????????????????? >>> >> >> > > > -- > Nikita Eelen > Network Manager > > AVE INTERVISION LLC > 6 4 0 West State Street > Alliance, Ohio 4 4 6 0 1 > > Office: 330-821-7117 ext. 108 > Cell: 330-257-9647 > email: neelen at amvonet.com > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20100607/02e01d6f/attachment.htm>
Received on Monday, 7 June 2010 08:17:44 UTC