- From: TAMURA, Kent <tkent@chromium.org>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 23:28:50 +0900
Please see http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/2010-July/027243.html In short words, I disagree with the current spec. On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 08:45, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote: > On Mon, 5 Apr 2010, TAMURA, Kent wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 06:37, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote: > > > On Sat, 3 Apr 2010, TAMURA, Kent wrote: > > > > > > > > I found type=number also had no typeMismatch. If a user wants to > > > > type a negative value, he types '-' first. This state should make > > > > typeMismatch true because '-' is not a valid floating point number. > > > > > > The user agent shouldn't update the value until the input is a valid > > > number. ("User agents must not allow the user to set the value to a > > > string that is not a valid floating point number.") > > > > Why are type=email and url different from type=number at this point? > Mostly because numbers are simpler, so it seemed less useful to expose > half-entered numbers to the script. However, if people disagree with this > I'm happy to change it so that those three work the same. > -- > Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL > http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. > Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.' -- TAMURA Kent Software Engineer, Google -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20100728/a8ccc17f/attachment.htm>
Received on Wednesday, 28 July 2010 07:28:50 UTC