W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > July 2010

[whatwg] Forms feedback

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 01:48:02 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1007280143560.7470@ps20323.dreamhostps.com>
On Tue, 6 Apr 2010, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> The proposal is to mandate that <input type=search> expose some sort of 
> "clear" widget in itself, which fires an appropriate event when the user 
> activates it.

It already does -- the event is "input" and in the case you describe, it 
would fire with value == "".

> [<input type=directory> vs <input type=file multiple>]
> The advantages are precisely what was listed in the email - a proper
> directory uploader with path information for the files (either baked
> into the filename or available separately) allows you to:
> 1. Easily accept multiple files with the same name, as long as they're
> in different directories (this restriction is already enforced in all
> major OSes)
> 2. Maintain the directory structure the user uploaded, for example a
> pictures directory with folders for "vacation" and "wedding" photos
> separate.
> 3. Expose the most appropriate UI to the user - in most file selection
> dialogs you are *unable* to select a folder itself.  In the few that
> allow it, it is often difficult to discover the functionality.  OSes
> do provide a proper directory picker, though, which is much more clear
> about what it does.

It seems like it should be up to the user whether to be able to select a 
directory or not. We could maintain the relative path information easily 
(just include the paths under C:\FAKEPATH\).

Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 27 July 2010 18:48:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:25 UTC