- From: Chris Double <chris.double@double.co.nz>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 02:24:14 +1200
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 2:15 AM, Mike Shaver <mike.shaver at gmail.com> wrote:
> ...I would probably suggest that the
> developers of said browser implement basic Ogg support (enough to say
> "this is Ogg, so we don't support it"), and go back to solving more
> pressing problems!
Or the developers of said browser could obey the mime type that the
server sent, not have to write or maintain error prone content
sniffing code that could behave differently across browsers ("Chrome
content sniffs this as Ogg but you dont!!", etc), and solve even more
pressing problems!
Chris.
--
http://www.bluishcoder.co.nz
Received on Wednesday, 21 July 2010 07:24:14 UTC