- From: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 09:06:51 -0700
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 3:28 AM, Philip J?genstedt <philipj at opera.com> wrote: > On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 12:00:41 +0200, Chris Double <chris.double at double.co.nz> > wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 9:48 PM, Philip J?genstedt <philipj at opera.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> I'd like to hear from Mozilla, Google and Apple which of these (or other) >>> solutions they would find acceptable. >> >> You'll probably get different responses depending on who in Mozilla >> responds. For example, I prefer option (1) and am against content >> sniffing. Other's at Mozilla disagree I'm sure. > > I'd like to hear from those that will actually make the decision and write > the code. > > I could go with (1) if Chrome does too. This topic is also being discussed on public-html. On that list Maciej explained why Safari behaves the way it does. I suspect that information would inform this discussion. Adam
Received on Tuesday, 20 July 2010 09:06:51 UTC