W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > July 2010

[whatwg] postMessage's target origin argument can be a full URL in some implementations

From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 15:45:14 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTimTnAEtiretvDPxUSPQ5xGxjbv_3mRM3R9SBoBa@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Hallvord R M Steen <hallvors at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> the way I read the spec, the target origin argument for
> window.postMessage should be a protocol, host name and optionally port
> number - in other words
>
> window.postMessage( 'foo', 'http://www.example.com' )
> or
> window.postMessage( 'foo', 'http://www.example.com:81' )
>
> However, it has come to my attention that both WebKit and Gecko's
> implementation of postMessage() allows a full URL with path:
>
> window.postMessage( 'foo', 'http://www.example.com/path/goes/here/' )
>
> Isn't this a violation of the spec?
>
> My personal opinion is that protocol+host+port is better, simply
> because authors might assume the path is significant (i.e. think that
> 'http://www.geocities.com/foo' and 'http://www.geocities.com/bar'
> would be different origins). Allowing paths that are simply ignored
> might muddle the "origin" concept - not a major problem, but a small
> potential point of confusion.
>
> Opera follows the spec (as I read it) and throws an exception if a URL
> with a path is used, but I've recently come across two different
> scripts breaking in Opera because of this issue. I think it's very
> important to get this clarified and hopefully fixed in WebKit and
> Gecko before usage is too common and we have to modify the spec to
> allow it :-(. (We're already discussing fixes with the two broken
> sites).
>
> Any comments from Mozilla and WebKit developers on the list?
>
> P.S.: we reported some bugs for you, in case you agree with our
> reading and want to fix it :-)
> https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42170
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=578380

My understanding is that this was a requirement from the spec. An
unfortunate one at that. However when I found out it was too late to
get the spec changed as multiple implementations had already shipped.

/ Jonas
Received on Wednesday, 14 July 2010 15:45:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:24 UTC