W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > July 2010

[whatwg] Article: Growing pains afflict HTML5 standardization

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 14:58:51 +0200
Message-ID: <4C3B118B.2030502@gmx.de>
On 12.07.2010 14:44, Mike Wilcox wrote:
> On Jul 12, 2010, at 2:30 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> Google:
>> <http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline&group=0
>> <http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline&group=0>>
>> - 35 errors
> That's a little different. Google purposely uses unstandardized,
> incorrect HTML in ways that still render in a browser in order to make
> it more difficult for screen scrapers. They also "break it" in a
> different way every week.

How exactly is it different?

Do you think that what Google does somehow is "better"?

Just asking.

As far as I can tell, it just shows that content providers continue to 
send whatever happens to work, thus are not concerned at all about 
validity (note: there's a permathread about this as well -- why disallow 
things that are known the work reliably...).

Best regards, Julian
Received on Monday, 12 July 2010 05:58:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:24 UTC