- From: Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 14:33:11 -0500
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Jonas Sicking <jonas at sicking.cc> wrote: > Indeed. But google is fairly alone in this design. I've seen plenty of > other websites with dynamically populated autocomplete lists which > doesn't put buttons in the list itself. For example the email > autocomplete in bugzilla.mozilla.org. Wikipedia's new search suggestions (part of the Vector skin) don't include images or anything, but they do boldface the parts of the suggestion that match what you've typed. They also add an extra option at the bottom to let you actually search for pages containing the term instead of just looking for title matches. So that needs markup too, not just plain text. But I agree that a purely text-based suggestion box would be useful to support anyway. I did try writing this up for MediaWiki -- you can see the code at <http://bits.wikimedia.org/skins-1.5/common/mwsuggest.js> (my modifications to the preexisting code are in <http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/61348>). But I disabled it because Opera was the only browser implementing datalist at the time, and its implementation had a fatal flaw. Now it's been mostly superseded by the fancier implementation I mention above, but flipping os_use_datalist to true in that file seems to work pretty well in Firefox. The old suggestion system is still used in non-Vector skins for now, so if you have some way to flip the variable, you can try it out on Wikipedia at a URL like <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page?useskin=monobook>. Noticeably, the list automatically incorporates extra suggestions based on browser form memory, and uses the system colors instead of site-determined colors. Both of these could be viewed as either good or bad, I guess. The datalist-based solution also has the suggestions line up exactly, while with the old way, it's a few pixels off (at least in Chrome). I provided some spec feedback at the time: <http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2010-January/024794.html>. I really agree with Hixie that a nicer JS API is necessary if you want authors to actually use datalist this way. It's gratuitously painful to update the list by fiddling with the DOM instead of just using a JavaScript array. Although it's still way, way easier than having to fake the box yourself with absolute positioning. I just enabled the <datalist>-based suggestions in MediaWiki trunk, for 1.18, since they work nicely for Firefox 4 (I've blacklisted Opera): <http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/79363>. But I don't know how long that suggest framework will survive, given the newer and fancier one that's part of the new Vector skin (for which datalist is too limiting to be useful).
Received on Friday, 31 December 2010 11:33:11 UTC