W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > December 2010

[whatwg] sic element, was: Re: Exposing spelling/grammar suggestions in contentEditable

From: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 16:45:41 +0000
Message-ID: <AANLkTin65P82_Jc7dRnmZVigrKgaRq0ZMVn09AKXoVNF@mail.gmail.com>

>> And here's a transcription that doesn't use "[sic]" in the same place
>> although its publisher considered it important to indicate the correct
>> reproduction of the original source in some way as well, as you can tell by
>> looking into the wiki markup source code, where he added a comment stating
>> the fact:
>> http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Constitution_of_the_United_States_of_America#Section_2
> I don't see that the comment adds anything that "q" and "blockquote" do not.

I meant to say: a comment seems to work fine here.

Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
Received on Friday, 31 December 2010 08:45:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:29 UTC