- From: Ashley Sheridan <ash@ashleysheridan.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 20:36:03 +0000
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 12:33 -0800, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Ashley Sheridan > <ash at ashleysheridan.co.uk> wrote: > > Would <aside> be more contextually accurate in the case of user-generated comments? I was of the understanding that <aside> elements were content that was related to the main <article> but not necessarily part of it. > > The opposite, actually. <aside> indicates things that are *un*related > to the main content, or only tangentially related. That's why it's > appropriate for things like sidebars on a blog, or pull-quotes in an > article. > > ~TJ Ah, my bad then, I thought it was intended as a sort of boxout thing like you might find in a magazine. Thanks, Ash http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20101213/bb58d862/attachment.htm>
Received on Monday, 13 December 2010 12:36:03 UTC