- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 16:46:47 -0800
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Adam Barth <w3c at adambarth.com> wrote: > We've seen use cases for a similar feature for iframes and hyperlinks. > ?For example: > > <a href="/logout" post-data>Logout</a> > > would be more semantically correct that just <a > href="/logout">Logout</a> because it would generate a POST instead of > a GET. Why wouldn't <form method=post action=/logout><button>Logout</button></form> work, with some CSS to make it look like a link if you wanted that? On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Philipp Serafin <phil127 at gmail.com> wrote: > There are quite a number of older web forums that sanitize their HTML using black lists and would not strip new attributes like "post-data". For malicious users, it would be very easy to include e.g. <img src="./do_post.php" post-data="thread_id=42&post_content=Go visit (some spam URL)"> in their signature and have users doing involuntary posts by simply viewing a thread. Indeed. You shouldn't be able to trigger POSTs from involuntary actions. They should always require some sort of user input, because there is simply *far* too much naive code out there that is vulnerable to CSRF. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 9 December 2010 16:46:47 UTC