- From: Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com>
- Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 09:40:48 -0800
Kevin, I spoke with a rep on Google TV, as well as a Microsoft IE rep: neither saw an active use-case for non-square pixels. There are cases where width is stretched / squished, but they're always handled by scaling the output image. Think of fancy window manager effects, and of the ratio selection available on many tvs. I think the cost of supporting a scaleX and scaleY are minimal; but as Robert suggests, the benefits are small. I've brought up the concept of a CSS Canvas, based on Robert's comments in this thread, where viewport transformations are taken into account by the rending engine. -Charles On 11/23/2010 5:06 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote: > On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Kevin Marks <kevinmarks at gmail.com > <mailto:kevinmarks at gmail.com>> wrote: > > Well, if we care about doing video processing with Canvas, > understanding anamorphic pixels is needed. > > > You mean the aspect ratio of the video source? Sure, but here we're > talking about the output device. > > Anyway, adding APIs to help browsers display better quality output on > NTSC or PAL TVs seems like a waste of time to me. > > Rob > -- > "Now the Bereans were of more noble character than the Thessalonians, > for they received the message with great eagerness and examined the > Scriptures every day to see if what Paul said was true." [Acts 17:11] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20101209/5be32092/attachment.htm>
Received on Thursday, 9 December 2010 09:40:48 UTC