- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 11:20:50 -0800
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky at mit.edu> wrote: > On 12/2/10 1:06 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> >> <img> ?does, though, if the resource for whatever reason hasn't been >> received and successfully decoded yet. > > I think showing @alt in this context for <img> would be _really_ weird... I agree; I'm just saying, it's the situation. I'd prefer for a non-loaded out-of-document <img> to do the "fully transparent image with no intrinsic dimensions" thing. I just don't think I can define that in the Image Values spec. Or, hm. Maybe I can, actually. I'll try it out and see what you guys think. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 2 December 2010 11:20:50 UTC