W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > April 2010

[whatwg] The real issue with HTML5's sectioning model

From: James Robinson <jamesr@google.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 18:42:03 -0700
Message-ID: <z2pad1a0c1e1004301842i5871dde0j1fad91ac32d9f513@mail.gmail.com>
Is this sort of reply really necessary?  I have not been following the
surrounding discussion, but this email showed up as a new thread in my mail
client.  Based on this tone, I now have no desire to catch up on the rest of
the discussion.

- James

On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk at opera.com> wrote:

> On Sat, 01 May 2010 03:57:42 +0900, Eduard Pascual <herenvardo at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> XHTML2's approach was clean and simple: <section>, <h>, and @role do
>> everything. Period.
>>
>
> Bullshit:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xhtml2-20060726/mod-structural.html#sec_8.5.
>
>
> --
> Anne van Kesteren
> http://annevankesteren.nl/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20100430/1c7e7aae/attachment.htm>
Received on Friday, 30 April 2010 18:42:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:22 UTC