W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > April 2010

[whatwg] The real issue with HTML5's sectioning model (was: "Headings and sections, role of H2-H6" and "Should default styles for h1-h6 match the outlining algorithm?")

From: Greg Houston <gregory.houston@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 14:47:36 -0500
Message-ID: <t2i29ae901a1004301247ta97667d6gaf87e949920f38df@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Eduard Pascual <herenvardo at gmail.com> wrote:

> So, that's enough of a problem statement (at least for now). My
> suggestion is to clean things a bit: consolidate the sectioning model
> into a single element+attribute pair, like this:
> <section> stays as is.
> <nav> becomes <section kind="nav">
> <aside> becomes <section kind="aside">
> <article> becomes <section kind="article">
> <address> becomes <section kind="address">

I haven't been following this thread, but for just the styling aspect
of it, the same thing can be accomplished by adding a "section" class
to each of these elements:

<section class="section">
<nav class="section">
<aside class="section">
<article class="section">
<address class="section">

So that this...

> h1 { styling for top-level }
> section h1 { styling for second-level }
> section section h1 { styling for third-level }

Becomes this:

h1
.section h1
.section .section h1

Regarding your proposal, if I wanted to style the following element
only, what would the CSS look like?

<section kind="aside">

Another option along the lines of your proposal, is you could still
have the same functionality without the kind="*" so that rather than

> <nav> becomes <section kind="nav">
> <aside> becomes <section kind="aside">
> <article> becomes <section kind="article">
> <address> becomes <section kind="address">

<nav> is treated as <section kind="nav">
<aside> is treated as <section kind="aside">
<article> is treated as <section kind="article">
<address> is treated as <section kind="address">

In this case nav, aside, article, and address are all types of
sections, and so any style added to a section is added to each of
these, with any style added to one of these specific elements
overriding the section style rules.

In both cases you lose the ability to apply CSS to a plain old section
that will not be automatically applied to the other elements. A third
option is to have a quasi-element that refers to all of these but is
never actually used in the HTML. It would just be a tool for CSS and
outlining algorithms. I can't think of a good name for it, but for
example, "sectional" could reference all of the following and anything
else one might thing should go in this list: section, nav, aside,
article, and address. Now you can style section without having to
override that styling in nav, aside, article, and address.

h1
sectional h1
sectional sectional h1

I think this last option might solve the problems without changing the
current html or css, and would simply add a hook for outlining
algorithms and other use cases where you want a clean way to get a
particular element at a particular depth.

Just some thoughts.

G.
Received on Friday, 30 April 2010 12:47:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:22 UTC