- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 00:42:02 +0000 (UTC)
On Thu, 1 Apr 2010, Dmitry Titov wrote: > > I think the only change to the spec here would be the removal of the 3rd > line in the description of what close() does, so the ports are still > functional, at least for posting from the worker: [...] I'm fine with doing this. > Not sure about onclose indeed... Perhaps we can use some time to see if > developers will request something like this more explicitly, then we > could think about it more. There's no onclose in the spec currently. It was removed to avoid exposing GC behaviour. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 1 April 2010 17:42:02 UTC