- From: Drew Wilson <atwilson@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 10:16:47 -0700
Certainly. If I explicitly override the charset, then that seems like reasonable behavior. Having the default decoding vary between importScripts() and <script> seems bad, especially since you can't override charsets with importScripts(). -atw On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk at opera.com>wrote: > On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 18:39:48 +0200, Drew Wilson <atwilson at google.com> > wrote: > >> Are you saying that if I load a script via a <script> tag in a web page, >> then load it via importScripts() in a worker, that the result of loading >> that script in those two cases should/could be different because of >> different decoding mechanisms? >> If that's what's being proposed, that seems bad. >> > > That could happen already if the script loaded via <script> did not have an > encoding set and got it from <script charset>. > > > -- > Anne van Kesteren > http://annevankesteren.nl/ > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20090925/acf44609/attachment.htm>
Received on Friday, 25 September 2009 10:16:47 UTC