- From: Bruce Lawson <brucel@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 14:56:24 +0100
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:55:50 +0100, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote: >> A widget. >> Although the spec specifically mentions widgets that can be reused, I >> haven't >> been able to find any use cases of this yet. I don't that <article> is >> an >> element name that readily springs to mind for developers publishing >> widgets. > > The widgets on iGoogle are an example. [snip] >> * The use case of marking up application widgets with <article> >> stretches the definition and makes it hard to come up with a good >> criteria for <article>. > > I think it's the same concept -- a self-contained blob of reusable > content. Oops. I'd just said on html5 doctor that I would mark those up with <section>. http://html5doctor.com/the-section-element/comment-page-1/#comment-1107 Each widget might be re-usable, but is it (coining new word:) syndicatable? Are re-usable and syndicatable synonymous? b
Received on Wednesday, 23 September 2009 06:56:24 UTC