- From: Chris Cressman <chris@chriscressman.com>
- Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 21:09:01 -0400
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 8:43 PM, ddailey <ddailey at zoominternet.net> wrote: ... > Question: what markup will be least cumbersome (and hence most recommended) > within a plain text document that may ultimately be converted > (automagically) to HTML5, assuming, in the meantime, that we may stoop so > low as to put it in HTML4. I know folks claim HTML5?will never break the > web, but those?folks and I have some beer to drink before we see eye to eye > on that subject, having seen the web break so many times in the last 1.7 > decades since I started playing with HTML at NCSA. Let us say I am a > skeptic. W3C has published "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" [1]. If I understand your question, I think that document will be helpful, particularly the sections on changed and absent elements/attributes. Avoid the absent elements and review the changed elements and you should be fine. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/html5-diff/ -- Chris Cressman http://chriscressman.com
Received on Sunday, 20 September 2009 18:09:01 UTC