- From: Yehuda Katz <wycats@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 14:26:17 -0700
Yep! So what's the reason not to do it ;) -- Yehuda On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Joseph Pecoraro <joepeck02 at gmail.com>wrote: > On Sep 20, 2009, at 4: 24PM, Juriy Zaytsev wrote: > >> Speaking of `document.head`, I think Mootools does exactly that. >> > > > Good thinking. I took a look at some JavaScript Libraries / Frameworks. > Here are some quick counts of how many times I could see that they use the > "getElementsByTagName" method of getting the "head" element: > > - MooTools 1.2.3 has: 2 > - jQuery 1.3.2 has: 2 > - Ext 3.0.0 has: 5 > - YUI 3.0.0b1 has: >10 > - Prototype 1.6.1, MochiKit 1.4.2, Dojo 1.3.2 have: 0 > > I am not making any criticism of the libraries. I'm just re-enforcing the > fact that it is a popular method of getting the "head" element, and adding > document.head would be a worthwhile improvement. > > - Joe > -- Yehuda Katz Developer | Engine Yard (ph) 718.877.1325 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20090920/407ab41b/attachment-0001.htm>
Received on Sunday, 20 September 2009 14:26:17 UTC