- From: Smylers <Smylers@stripey.com>
- Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 10:09:20 +0100
Erik Vorhes writes: > A use-case for "person's name" in the context of <cite>: > > In reference to many Classical texts one will often refer to the > author in lieu of the title (or in some cases that author's corpus). That isn't an argument for people's names _in general_ being marked up; it's an argument for marking them up in the specific case where they are used as (nicknames of) titles of works. > E.g.: > > <p>You should read <cite>Herodotus</cite>.</p> That's using "Herodotus" as the title of a work. In many fields it's common to refer to well-known works by nicknames, such as 'Smith & Thomas', 'The Dragon Book', 'The Red Book', or 'The White Album'. So <cite> should be used for them. But it doesn't follow that <cite> should be used for any other occurrences of those terms -- the people Smith and Thomas, or a book which just happens to be red. Smylers
Received on Sunday, 20 September 2009 02:09:20 UTC