- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:28:36 +0000 (UTC)
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009, Bruce Lawson wrote: > > Seems to me that (current) sections aren't for syndicating (tabs, > chapters etc), while blog posts (currently articles) *are* for potential > syndication (although the cite attribute was recently removed from > article). I've adjusted the spec's definition more in line with this. > A comment in an article is also marked up as article, but is unlikely to > be a candidate for syndication as it's out of context. > > Is this correct? As James on IRC pointed out: http://intertwingly.net/blog/comments.html http://firehose.diveintomark.org/ http://www.zeldman.com/comments/feed/ Also, consider Twitter, Reddit, most forums, etc, where individual comments are definitely syndicated. cite="" was removed because it's already possible to include a permalink using <a>, by the way: <a href="/1234" rel="bookmark">#</a> -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 16 September 2009 04:28:36 UTC