- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:22:14 +0200
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:37:57 +0200, Nabil Elisa <nabil.elisa at gmail.com> wrote: > Furthermore I'm not sure I agree with Ian's argument for holding out > until the browsers support the current API more reliably. My > experience has > shown that there are numerous cross-browser incompatibilities in the > existing implementations of more trivial features, yet we are not waiting > for all of those to get resolved before adding support for, say, native > video. So why should this be any different? The argument Ian made was not support for feature A is brittle so we should not do feature B. It was support for feature A is brittle so we should do not do feature A-2 just yet. > Anyway, I'm new to this group and don't know much about how decisions are > usually made here, but in case there was any doubt about this idea's > popularity I'd like to lend it my own +1. Decisions are usually made based on merit, not popularity. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Tuesday, 15 September 2009 03:22:14 UTC