[whatwg] Editorial: Colloquial contractions

On Tue, 8 Sep 2009, ?istein E. Andersen wrote:
>
> The spec currently contains a few occurrences of colloquial contractions 
> like "can't", "won't" and "there's", which should be changed to 
> "cannot", "will not", "there is" etc. for consistency.

I haven't changed this, because it doesn't seem especially important, 
frankly. If there are specific cases where you think the current text 
reads poorly due to the use of contractions, please let me know.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Monday, 14 September 2009 18:37:54 UTC