- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 14:51:24 -0700
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Chris Jones<cjones at mozilla.com> wrote: > No one has responded directly to my original proposal of making > |window.localStorage === undefined| until |window.transaction| or whatever > has been accessed. ?Unlike your proposal and a similar one from Jeremy, mine > is a "safe" (non-racy) way for spec-compliant UAs to "bend" backwards > compatibility without explicitly breaking it. How is that not breaking compatibility? Any existing pages will directly access window.localStorage to read/write data. Such pages would break with your proposal, no? / Jonas
Received on Tuesday, 8 September 2009 14:51:24 UTC