- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 18:03:08 +0200
On Tue, 08 Sep 2009 17:57:36 +0200, Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov at chromium.org> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 6:12 AM, Anne van Kesteren<annevk at opera.com> > wrote: >> FWIW, this is why I think pushState is great. If you bookmark it and >> later >> visit that page it allows the server to directly give the right content >> back >> instead of first loading a page which then fetches additional content >> based >> on the fragment identifier. And although disabling JavaScript these >> days is >> probably close to a non-starter it would allow you to create interfaces >> that >> have the same URL regardless of whether JavaScript is enabled or >> disabled >> and still use fancy effects and downloaded content incrementally when >> JavaScript is enabled. > > True, that's a benefit -- compared to the current hash-navigation > systems. But I guess what I am trying to say is let's work to provide > ways to make navigation cheap, rather than improving ways to simulate > navigation. Yeah, your follow-up message in the separate thread sounded rather intriguing. If JavaScript can be somehow kept-alive while navigating to a new page within a single domain, be in control of what is displayed and without security issues and all that'd be rather cool and also solve the issue. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Tuesday, 8 September 2009 09:03:08 UTC