[whatwg] HTML5 at Last Call (at the WHATWG)

Hi, all.

Congratulations on Last Call!

I'm administrator of HTML5 community in Japan
(http://translate.google.co.jp/translate?prev=hp&hl=ja&js=y&u=http://blog.livedoor.jp/kotesaki/archives/1290508.html&sl=ja&tl=en&history_state0=).

I would like to make known an act to celebrate the occasion.
Today, one of the community's member have created the "HTML5 clock"
iGoogle gadget which uses the logos created by Japanese designers.

http://translate.google.co.jp/translate?prev=hp&hl=ja&js=y&u=http://blog.livedoor.jp/kotesaki/archives/1290508.html&sl=ja&tl=en&history_state0=

If someone want to give feedback to him or designers, please tell me
or post to the community's mailing list directly!

I'm sorry for talking bollocks.
Kind regards.

--Shumpei


On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 7:12 AM, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote:
>
> For a brief period today, there were no outstanding e-mails or bugs on the
> specs, and so I took that opportunity to transition us here at the WHATWG
> to the next stage of HTML5's development: Last Call! This affects three
> specs at the WHATWG:
>
> ?* HTML5
> ? http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/
>
> ?* Web Workers
> ? http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-workers/current-work/
>
> ?* Microdata vocabularies
> ? http://www.whatwg.org/specs/vocabs/current-work/
>
> There's also a version of the spec called Web Applications 1.0 (for
> nostalgic reasons) that has all of the above as well as a number of other
> specs, namely Web Storage, Web Database, Server-sent Events, and the Web
> Sockets API and protocol, all together in one document. With the exception
> of the Web Database spec, they're all now in last call at the WHATWG:
>
> ? http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/complete.html (5MB)
>
> So if you've been waiting to see if someone else would report the problem
> that you had seen, well, if it's not fixed, they didn't! So you should now
> send that feedback in yourself.
>
> If you sent an e-mail or filed a bug that I haven't replied to, then
> please send it again. A few weeks ago I noticed that I was losing about 1%
> of e-mail to a rogue and overeager spam filter, and I don't know how long
> that had been going on, so if I didn't reply that's probably why.
>
> (Note that this only applies to the WHATWG -- the W3C HTML WG is not yet
> at Last Call.)
>
> --
> Ian Hickson ? ? ? ? ? ? ? U+1047E ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?)\._.,--....,'``. ? ?fL
> http://ln.hixie.ch/ ? ? ? U+263A ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?/, ? _.. \ ? _\ ?;`._ ,.
> Things that are impossible just take longer. ? `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
>

Received on Tuesday, 27 October 2009 21:31:52 UTC