- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 08:54:49 +0000 (UTC)
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, Honza Bambas wrote: > > The spec says: > > "When the |setItem() > <http://dev.w3.org/html5/webstorage/#dom-storage-setitem>|, |removeItem() > <http://dev.w3.org/html5/webstorage/#dom-storage-removeitem>|, and |clear() > <http://dev.w3.org/html5/webstorage/#dom-storage-clear>| methods are called on > a |Storage <http://dev.w3.org/html5/webstorage/#storage-0>| object x that is > associated with a session storage area, if the methods did something, then in > every |HTMLDocument| object whose |Window| object's |sessionStorage > <http://dev.w3.org/html5/webstorage/#dom-sessionstorage>| attribute's |Storage > <http://dev.w3.org/html5/webstorage/#storage-0>| object is associated with the > same storage area, other than x, a |storage > <http://dev.w3.org/html5/webstorage/#event-storage>| event must be fired, as > described below <http://dev.w3.org/html5/webstorage/#event-storage>." > > [http://dev.w3.org/html5/webstorage/#dom-sessionstorage] > > The same applies to localStorage. > > Maybe I read something wrong, but as a sessionStorage object is always > unique to its document (it is cloned when a new document with the same > origin is created and then independent from the original document's > object) it, in my opinion, doesn't make sense to send the event to any > other document then the one its storage has been changed. On the other > hand, it makes sense to me to not fire the event in the same document > where the storage has been changed (as for localStorage), then, I'd say > there should be no event for sessionStorage at all. I simply don't a > case when two or more documents would share a single sessionStorage > object. > > Thanks for clearing this. You can have multiple (active) documents sharing the same sessionHistory using nested browsing contexts, for example in <iframe>, <object>, and <frameset>/<frame>. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 27 October 2009 01:54:49 UTC