W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > October 2009

[whatwg] .tags()

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 20:01:14 -0400
Message-ID: <4ADCFDCA.1000900@mit.edu>
On 10/19/09 6:30 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> In particular I'm wondering what made other vendors decide to
> support this.

I'd already asked this on this list, back in July.  The relevant answers 
(from the "[whatwg] .tags on HTMLCollections" thread):

On Tue, 14 Jul 2009, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>> Support for HTMLCollection.tags() in WebKit predates the fork from
>> KHTML. So we don't know why it was originally added.

On Tue, 14 Jul 2009, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>> I don't know of a reason it's needed for collections other than
>> document.all. But it also doesn't seem harmful and I can't say
>> definitively whether it helps anything. I wouldn't object to
>> removing it from the spec, but we probably wouldn't remove it from
>> WebKit short of evidence that it's actually harmful.
>> Perhaps Opera people can shed more light on the matter.

On Thu, 23 Jul 2009, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>> From what I heard so far it is there because of document.all. If
>> document.all does indeed need to return a separate object as HTML5
>> suggests we can probably remove it from HTMLCollection in due
>> course.

Received on Monday, 19 October 2009 17:01:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:18 UTC