- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 09:52:51 +0000 (UTC)
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009, Yuvalik Webdesign wrote: > > I'll give it one more go. ;-) > > Perhaps you could leave the existing sentence, but add: > > "In short; a transparent element must have the same content model as its > parent." > > Or something to that effect? On Wed, 14 Oct 2009, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > > That's still not accurate, though. ^_^ I mean, it's *correct*, but it's > not a summarization of the existing sentence (which is implied by "in > short"). Ian pointed out how a transparent element can have children > that would match the content model of the parent, but that wouldn't be > correct if simply inserted into the parent (the example with <unique>). On Wed, 14 Oct 2009, Yuvalik Webdesign wrote: > > Hmm, yes. Oh well. I give up. You see why I ended up with the complicated text that's in the spec now. :-) > It's not that important anyway. And with the added example I am sure it > will be ok. Ok. Cheers, -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Saturday, 17 October 2009 02:52:51 UTC