- From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
- Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 09:45:38 +1300
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 5:47 AM, Charles Pritchard <chuck at jumis.com> wrote: > In regard to this: 'There is currently no definition of what the "extent" > of a shape is' > > While I want a common standard, and I think we are in agreement here, that > we'll > be defining Image A as an infinite bitmap, I believe that this statement > should be addressed. > If nothing in the spec depends on a definition of the "extent" of a shape, then the spec should not define it. Rob -- "He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities; the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all." [Isaiah 53:5-6] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20091017/6b97a19c/attachment-0001.htm>
Received on Friday, 16 October 2009 13:45:38 UTC