- From: Markus Ernst <derernst@gmx.ch>
- Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:16:48 +0200
Aryeh Gregor schrieb: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:49 AM, Nelson Menezes > <flying.mushroom at gmail.com> wrote: >> As an aside, there is a reason why AJAX has become so popular over the >> past few years: it solves the specific UI-reset issue that is inherent >> in full-page refreshes. > > I'm trying to think what a solution to this would look like. Maybe > something like: > > <static id=foo>Some stuff that doesn't change on page load...</static> > Changeable page content > <static id=bar>Some more stuff that doesn't change...</static> Interesting idea! Anyway it introduces some consistency problems to solve, e.g.: Page1.html contains: <static id="foo">I eat meat</static> and links to page2.html, which contains: <static id="foo">I am a vegetarian</static> So page2.html looks different whether it is called from the link in page1.html, or directly via a bookmark, external link, or manual URI input. This could be solved if "static" elements have no content on their own, but retrieve it from an external source. The identifyer is then not the id attribute, but the source. This could be done with a src attribute on the <static> element. But I assume an easier implementation would be adding a "static" attribute for the <iframe> element, indicating that the iframe contents should not be reloaded. -- Markus
Received on Friday, 16 October 2009 04:16:48 UTC