- From: Drew Wilson <atwilson@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:54:23 -0700
To be absolutely clear (since there's some confusion about whether we are talking about explicit MessagePorts, or about implicit ports for dedicated workers). Are you saying that this: var channel = new MessageChannel(); channel.port1.postMessage("hi mom"); channel.port2.addEventListener("message", function(event) {alert(event.data); }, false); Should result in an alert dialog being fired? Because that does not match my reading of the spec at all - the spec explicitly states that a port's message queue is only enabled via start() or via setting the onmessage IDL attribute. I would not be opposed to changing the spec to include enabling a port's message queue when addEventListener("message") is invoked. -atw On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:32 AM, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote: > On Tue, 29 Sep 2009, Zoltan Herczeg wrote: > > > > In WebKit implementation of MessagePort the addEventListener("message", > > ...) does not enable the transmitting of messages. All messages are > > actually discarded until a dummy function is assigned to onmessage. > > That is a bug. The port message queue is explicitly enabled during the > creation of the dedicated worker (step 12). > > > > And in the normative text, it is not mentioned that addEventListener > > should also enable message transmitting. > > The normative text just says to fire an event; the DOM Events spec makes > it clear that events can be handled using addEventListener()-added > handlers. > > > > Anyway, my qestion is: > > - should addEventListener enable message transmitting? > > Yes. > > > - Should it do it in all cases, or only when "message" is passed as the > > first argument > > It should only receive 'message' events if you say 'message' as the first > argument. > > -- > Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL > http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. > Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.' > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20091015/c082f5bb/attachment-0001.htm>
Received on Thursday, 15 October 2009 10:54:23 UTC