- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 10:23:09 +0000 (UTC)
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009, Simon Pieters wrote: > > DedicatedWorkerGlobalScope and SharedWorkerGlobalScope probably shouldn't have > [Supplemental]. Yes, they should -- it means that their definitions are just globbed onto the definition of their ancestor, WorkerGlobalScope, as if there was one WorkerGlobalScope in dedicated workers and one in shared workers. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 14 October 2009 03:23:09 UTC