- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 22:16:06 +0000 (UTC)
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009, Yuvalik Webdesign wrote: > > Anyway, Perhaps this will do? > > "If a transparent element were to be removed but its descendants were > kept as they are, the content should remain conformant." > > Or: > > "Any transparent content should be conformant as if its transparent > containing element did not exist." Unfortunately both of these can be interpreted as saying that the element and all its children disappear -- "kept as they are" implies kept as children of the element; "[parent] element did not exist" implies the kids aren't in the tree, etc. > But again, perhaps the added example makes things clear enough. Just > trying to help. Your help is much appreciated. I'm glad the example helps. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 13 October 2009 15:16:06 UTC