W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > October 2009

[whatwg] The banner-role for headers

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:34:07 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0910121133510.25383@hixie.dreamhostps.com>
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009, Yuvalik Webdesign wrote:
>
> In section 3.2.6 (Assistive technologies) it states in the table that 
> <header> has an implied ARIA role of ?banner?. However, the spec 
> description of <header> does not comply with the description of the 
> banner-role in the ARIA-spec. ARIA states:
> 
> ?A region that contains the primary heading or web site title. Most of 
> the content of a banner is site-oriented, rather than being 
> page-specific. [...], the author *SHOULD mark no more than _one element_ 
> with the banner role*.?
> 
> Which makes sense to me, a banner is not a header. In other words, if 
> <header> implies a banner-role, it may only be used once on a page 
> unless that role is overridden for additional <header>s. Is this an 
> oversight in the spec or is this to remain like this? If so, how should 
> this contradiction be approached by designers/developers.

That's an oversight. What would be a better ARIA role to use for <header>?

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 12 October 2009 04:34:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:53 UTC