W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > October 2009

[whatwg] framesets

From: Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 13:16:37 -0400
Message-ID: <7c2a12e20910091016i348ffc93h62dab32cb1d53b2f@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Peter Brawley <pb at artfulsoftware.com> wrote:
> Oy, from the fact that users find web page links useful, it does not follow
> that all identified content ought to be so linked.

It suggests that not linking is a serious drawback.

> A design goal of this use case is to isolate individual framed items from
> URL back/forward/history.external linking. Analagous to watching a picture
> show where selecting N pictures does not commit you to hitting the Back
> button N times to get back out.

Why shouldn't it?  It's how all other links work.  Behavior should be
consistent.

> More significantly, each item may have its
> own permission setting.

Why are frames useful for that?  You can just display a permissions
error if the user is unauthorized.

> This use case needs to isolate items within the page from
> back/forward/history and external links.

Why?  That seems to detract from the utility here, not add to it.
Received on Friday, 9 October 2009 10:16:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:17 UTC