- From: Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 13:16:37 -0400
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Peter Brawley <pb at artfulsoftware.com> wrote: > Oy, from the fact that users find web page links useful, it does not follow > that all identified content ought to be so linked. It suggests that not linking is a serious drawback. > A design goal of this use case is to isolate individual framed items from > URL back/forward/history.external linking. Analagous to watching a picture > show where selecting N pictures does not commit you to hitting the Back > button N times to get back out. Why shouldn't it? It's how all other links work. Behavior should be consistent. > More significantly, each item may have its > own permission setting. Why are frames useful for that? You can just display a permissions error if the user is unauthorized. > This use case needs to isolate items within the page from > back/forward/history and external links. Why? That seems to detract from the utility here, not add to it.
Received on Friday, 9 October 2009 10:16:37 UTC