- From: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 09:35:08 +0200
On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 08:42:12 +0200, Simon Pieters <simonp at opera.com> wrote: > On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 23:19:28 +0200, Robert O'Callahan > <robert at ocallahan.org> wrote: > >> On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 6:42 AM, Eric Carlson <eric.carlson at apple.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I am not worried about the aesthetics of not having the event. I am >>> somewhat concerned about existing content that uses it (including many >>> of >>> the WebKit layout tests :-( ), but I think we will be better off in >>> the long >>> run if we get rid of the event and network state now. >>> >> >> Me too. I'm game if you are! >> >> So I propose: >> 1) Remove the NETWORK_LOADED state and "load" and "loadend" events from >> media elements. > > 'loadend' also fires after 'abort' and (when using the src attribute) > 'error'. Should that stay as is, or also be removed? Since we're going to contradict the progress events spec anyway, I would suggest dropping all 'loadend' events. They're just not very useful. >> The resource fetch algorithm simply never transitions from >> step 2 to step 3. >> 2) Modify Gecko and Webkit accordingly. >> >> If we do part 2, which I think is already permitted by the spec, then >> authors will stop depending on "load" whether or not we get consensus >> for >> altering the spec. >> >> Rob > > -- Philip J?genstedt Opera Software
Received on Friday, 9 October 2009 00:35:08 UTC