- From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
- Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 09:53:45 +1300
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 7:31 AM, Philip J?genstedt <philipj at opera.com> wrote: > I wouldn't be particularly opposed to dropping the load event, unless > there's a use case for the guarantee that the resource won't be evicted from > cache as long as the page is loaded. > If there is a need for that, then I think we should add some kind of pinning API, although I'm not sure how it would avoid the problem of greedy authors pinning resources unnecessarily. But we'd have to consider the actual use cases. Rob -- "He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities; the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all." [Isaiah 53:5-6] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20091009/f161ae7a/attachment.htm>
Received on Thursday, 8 October 2009 13:53:45 UTC