- From: David Workman <workmad3@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 23:33:35 +0100
2009/10/6 Hugh Guiney <hugh.guiney at gmail.com> > On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Erik Vorhes <erik at textivism.com> wrote: > > I suppose <a> allows for more functionality in current UAs, but this > > is an interesting proposition, especially if there were a way to > > crosslink <cite> used in this way to the original source (or whatever > > it would point to). Would it be something along the lines of <cite > > for="aside-id">, or did you have something else in mind? > > How about <cite cite="uri">, as it would have been in XHTML 2? > I don't know about others, but that just looks ugly to me (the repetition of 'cite' looks unnecessary). I know elegance isn't crucial, but given the choice between <cite for=""> and <cite cite=""> I'd go for the former. As a possibility though, <cite> could have a 'for' attribute in the same manner as a label and also support a 'src' attribute to link the element to the original source, giving: <cite for="aside-id" src="uri"> What browsers do with the src attribute can be decided later, but it could easily be used as a more semantically meaningful <a> tag where appropriate. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20091006/737ce0f8/attachment.htm>
Received on Tuesday, 6 October 2009 15:33:35 UTC