- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 17:51:55 -0500
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Dean Edwards <dean.edwards at gmail.com> wrote: > On 29/09/2009 21:55, Keryx Web wrote: >> 2009-09-29 21:53, Dean Edwards wrote: >>> Can't we just invent some new elements? We've already created 20 >>> new ones. Two more won't hurt. :) >> >> This has been discussed on the HTML5 WG list to death. > > Can we revisit this? It seems to important to sweep under the carpet. The basic issue is that the use-case for <figure> and <details> are sorta minimal anyway - it's enough that they can justify themselves, but just barely. If we have to mint *more* new elements just to get them to work, that moves them from "barely worth the effort" to "meh, just drop it". <dt>/<dd> only have parsing problems in IE6 and IE7. Both of them *are*, finally, actually dropping off the radar. Windows 7 will accelerate this as people upgrade with an OS that runs IE8 by default. Give it 2 years or so and most places will be able to justify ignoring IE7 (many/most sites already ignore IE6). In the meantime, we can just keep using <div>s to handle both of these cases, like we do right now. ~TJ
Received on Friday, 2 October 2009 15:51:55 UTC