[whatwg] [HTML5] About the <pre> element

On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:50 PM, David Bruant
<bruant at enseirb-matmeca.fr> wrote:
> => However, for this point, I am confused. It's true that currently,
> <img> elements are not intended to have a content, but ASCII art, as
> images, is probably the best (if not only ?) reason to allow text
> content in img elements, thus naturally allowing the alt attribute which
> doesn't exist in the "second-closest" semantic element.

It's impossible at this point to make <img> elements take contents.
They're void elements in every single browser in existence.

~TJ