- From: Geoffrey Sneddon <gsneddon@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:17:06 +0100
Aryeh Gregor wrote: > On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:33 AM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky at mit.edu> wrote: >> I assume you meant "mostly" as in "most of the pages are well-formed", not >> "pages are mostly well-formed", since the latter is useless, right? >> >> I did a brief survey of obvious sites fitting those descriptions that I had >> in my browser history at the moment. . . . >> >> So either you're looking at a totally different dataset or "mostly" is a bit >> of a stretch.... > > I admit I didn't look closely. At a guess, maybe the default > WordPress skin(s) are valid XHTML, but custom skins are very popular > for WordPress and those mostly aren't valid XHTML? MediaWiki is > unreasonably difficult to reskin, so that's not much of a problem for > us . . . Even with the default skin it's easy to break (e.g., search for U+FFFF). That'll be output to the page and make it not well-formed. -- Geoffrey Sneddon ? Opera Software <http://gsnedders.com/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Thursday, 12 November 2009 08:17:06 UTC