- From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 23:52:42 +0100
On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:11:18 +0100, Brian Campbell <brian.p.campbell at dartmouth.edu> wrote: >> Brian, since Firefox is doing what you proposed -- can you think of any >> other issues with its current implementation? What about for audio >> files? > > The way Firefox works is fine for me. I haven't yet tested it with audio > only, but something around 25 or 30 updates per second would work fine > for all use cases that I have; 15 updates per second is about the > minimum I'd consider useful for synchronizing one off events like > bullets or slide transitions (this is for stuff where you want good, > tight sync for stuff with high production values), and while animations > would work at that rate, they'd be pretty jerky. What if you have a video with say one frame per second? Unless I'm mistaken Firefox will still fire timeupdate once per frame. (The spec says you have to fire at least every 250ms.) -- Simon Pieters Opera Software
Received on Friday, 6 November 2009 14:52:42 UTC