W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > May 2009

[whatwg] First or last Content-Type header?

From: Adam Barth <whatwg@adambarth.com>
Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 10:06:24 -0700
Message-ID: <7789133a0905311006y1587c557wa7c3228032884869@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 4:55 AM, Geoffrey Sneddon
<foolistbar at googlemail.com> wrote:
> I, on the whole, would be tempted to take the first header, and use
> a list of headers that you expect to only appear once (i.e., a mix of
> behaviours).

Is there a particular reason why you think we should use the first
Content-Type header?  It seems like 4/5 browsers prefer the last
Content-Type header.

Adam
Received on Sunday, 31 May 2009 10:06:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:12 UTC