[whatwg] First or last Content-Type header?

On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 4:55 AM, Geoffrey Sneddon
<foolistbar at googlemail.com> wrote:
> I, on the whole, would be tempted to take the first header, and use
> a list of headers that you expect to only appear once (i.e., a mix of
> behaviours).

Is there a particular reason why you think we should use the first
Content-Type header?  It seems like 4/5 browsers prefer the last
Content-Type header.

Adam

Received on Sunday, 31 May 2009 10:06:24 UTC