W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > May 2009

[whatwg] Removing the need for separate feeds

From: Kornel Lesinski <kornel@geekhood.net>
Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 03:51:18 +0100
Message-ID: <op.uuc3jsccptj49s@aimac.local>
On Fri, 22 May 2009 07:01:51 +0100, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote:

> It doesn't collect the blogroll or the blog post tags yet, mostly because
> I'm not sure how to do that. Any suggestions of improvements are  
> naturally welcome.

There's hAtom that solves this problem already, and appears to have been proliferated by popular blogging software:

but I doubt that many users take advantage of it. Almost all of these pages have standard feeds as well (and all of them can provide them via hAtom2Atom proxy).

Maybe a better approach would be to extend hAtom or define extraction in terms of hAtom? (e.g. make <div class="hentry"> and <article> interchangeable?)

> For each article element article that does not have an ancestor article element

That excludes possibility of syndicating article's comments from markup like this:


Feed with only single entry "post" or "post comment comment" would not be useful.

OTOH it may be useful to include all nested comments in a single feed:

		<article>comment reply</article>

Another problem is that algorithm cannot create <summary>. Perhaps <summary> could be assumed if there's alternate link and article doesn't contain more than one header? Or has entire contents wrapped in <blockquote>?

I haven't noticed any way to exclude articles from the feed (except hack <article><article>...</article></article>). I may have news that's not important enough to justify notification of all subscribers. Are trackbacks and tweets appropriate for <article>? I might want to show them on my page, but wouldn't want to repost them in my feeds.

regards, Kornel Lesinski
Received on Friday, 22 May 2009 19:51:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:12 UTC