- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 09:42:16 +0200
On 22/5/09 09:21, Ian Hickson wrote: > On Fri, 22 May 2009, Henri Sivonen wrote: >> On May 22, 2009, at 09:01, Ian Hickson wrote: >>> USE CASE: Remove the need for feeds to restate the content of HTML pages >>> (i.e. replace Atom with HTML). >> Did you do some kind of "Is this Good for the Web?" analysis on this >> one? That is, do things get better if there's yet another feed format? > > As far as I can tell, things get better if the feed format and the default > output format are the same, yes. Generally, redundant information has > tended to lead to problems. Would this include having a mechanism (microdata? xml islands?) that preserves extension markup from Atom feeds? eg. see http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-extatom1/ cheers, Dan
Received on Friday, 22 May 2009 00:42:16 UTC