- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 16:16:56 -0500
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 2:45 AM, Bruce Lawson <brucel at opera.com> wrote: > On Fri, 08 May 2009 02:10:20 +0100, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage at gmail.com> > wrote: >> I don't see why this should be a browser requirement. ?UAs are >> *allowed* to provide such a facility to their users, so if your UA >> doesn't, complain until they do! > > Perfect solution for those who live in Utopia. But as many users neither > choose their browsers, or are unable to change them, it's better to require > it of the browser. Browser developers are typically attentive to accessibility issues, especially when they can be resolved by something as easy as a simple config entry. A SHOULD would be sufficient there. The issue is that not all browsers have significant configs (I'm thinking of mobile browsers here), and I don't believe their inability to provide such a choice to the user should make them nonconforming. As well, recall that the majority browser for 'unsophisticated' users is still IE6 or 7, and IE8 still lacks any support for <video> at all, so those users will be stuck dealing with js and flash-based video for some time still. Marginally more savvy users will be using FF, Opera, or Safari, all of which I believe would likely be receptive to this change. ~TJ
Received on Saturday, 9 May 2009 14:16:56 UTC